August 2012 Route Applications

by

Hueco Wall (5.12/12+), Maiden South Face:

Hueco Wall, showing all three pitches.

The Hueco Wall climbs the stunning, highly-hueco’d steep face up the center of the south face of the Maiden. It could be climbed in three pitches (45 ft, 80 ft, and 80 ft) or two longer pitches.  It starts directly below the end of the first pitch of the South Face (SF) route and climbs up to the same anchor, overlapping with the SF 1st pitch in the last 15 feet.   No bolts would be used anywhere near this overlap as adequate existing natural protection (and an existing fixed piton) are present.  The existing 1st pitch SF anchor consists of slings around a rock horn and carabiners, though other solid, natural protection is also available in this same area. The fixed slings and biners are commonly used for rappelling the South Face Route.

The South Face route starts downhill and to the right (east) approximately 60 feet and traverses left to finish at this same belay, while the start of the Kor Dalke route is uphill and to the west approximately 50 feet.  The somewhat obscure (andunrepeated) Eye of the Storm also begins from the same first pitch SF belay, though traverses hard left to a large “mitten” flake feature.  It apparently goes up the right side of the mitten flake (we recently observed fixed slings in that crack) and continues traversing up and left.  At one point, the Hueco Wall line comes within about 10 feet of this flake, though only briefly.   The wall has 5 existing traditional routes ranging from 5.8 to 5.12a.  From left to right (west to east), the routes are Gates of Galas (5.10d R), the Kor-Dalke (12a R), Eye of the Storm (5.9 X), the South Face (5.8 PG-13), and South Crack (5.11b). All of these existing routes and the proposed route are shown in the photo here.

Maiden approach trail.

The approach is the standard Maiden established trail to the south face climbs.  The trail involves leaving the Mesa Trail near an old quarry north of Shadow Canyon, following the quarry road to the north for a few hundred yards, then following a small climber trail (see photo below) up to the eastern toe of the Maiden.  This narrow trail is mostly dirt and rocks and is in good shape and appears stable.  The base of the south face of the Maiden is approximately 1 mile from the fork off the Mesa Trail.

The proposed route would end (atop its third pitch) at a double-bolt anchor down off the summit ridge, out of view of the East Ridge; one could either lower from here back to the pitch-two anchor or continue up and finish with an easy 5.6 section to the summit. When descending from atop the second pitch, an approximate 80-foot rappel would be required to get down to the first-pitch South Face rappel anchor. Another 50-foot rappel would be required to get back to the ground and base of the route.  It might be possible to lower from the second-pitch anchor with a 70-m rope though this has not been tested. The route should require about 25-26 bolts total: 4 lead bolts on the first section/pitch; 8 lead bolts plus a 2-bolt anchor on the second pitch; and 9/10 lead bolts on the third pitch to a 2-bolt anchor.

The base of the climb is rocky but includes some bushes and trees, and there is little or no existing erosion. We recommend using the same rocky staging area as for the SF route, as the very base of the climb is a narrow rocky gully bordered by trees.   The photo below shows the proposed staging area and the start of the climb can be seen in that shady gully approximately 30 feet behind the seated climber.

Hueco Wall staging area at base.

Reconnaissance work has been completed over four different days and the rock is extremely clean in general, though some potentially friable rock exists in the first 10 feet of the second pitch above the belay anchor atop pitch one of the South Face.  The route has been toproped, and all but the last 15 feet or so of the second pitch was free climbed, due to a lack of directional anchors to hold us into the wall when we fell.  The first pitch went free at about 5.9 and the second pitch is 5.11 to our highpoint.  Rigging of the toprope was tricky and required directional gear placements that were difficult to set due to the overhanging nature of the rock in that area.  Obvious holds were present in the last 15 feet of the second pitch, though it was difficult to toprope this part due to the swing potential based on available directionals.  While not able to free-climb the last few feet due to challenging toprope conditions, we believe that the finish of the second pitch would be in the 5.11+/5.12- range.  Only small portions of the third pitch were climbed free due to large swings when falling on toprope and lack of available directionals.  We estimate the third pitch to be rated somewhere in the 5.12 range, and obvious holds were present throughout the line shown in the photos. Due also to the overhanging nature of the rock above our proposed second-pitch anchor, it will be necessary to drill one or two holes and place one or two bolts on the third pitch to get in and safely install this anchor the first time down, as well as to toprope the third pitch. We will endeavor to place the bolts in obvious clipping stances; barring that, we’ll use removable Triplex bolts. Any temporary bolts would then be removed, and the holes patched and camouflaged.

FHRC Overview of the application: Complete

Voting Results: Approved

OSMP Decision: Pending

PUBLIC COMMENTS: 
Login and post comments, or send your comments to fhrc@flatironsclimbing.org – be sure to include the name of the route application your comment pertains to.

About these ads

11 Responses to “August 2012 Route Applications”

  1. Tony Bubb Says:

    This route should be approved. If the proximity to Eye Of the Storm is any concern, please do not let it be. As the only guy known to have ever climbed that, my opinion is that E.O.T.S. was 1) accidental wandering 2) junk. It shouldn’t really be a concern. It also shares very little with this route and if I’d been allowed to bolt it at the time, I might have and made it a reasonable route…

  2. Chris Archer Says:

    This route looks amazing. The climbing appears to be high quality and spectacularly positioned. The approach and base of the climb have been used by climbers for almost 60 years, so any impact from the route to flora and fauna is likely negligible to non existent. I agree that the route should be approved and hope the applicants apply for and receive approval for this and the third pitch, which looks wild!

  3. kevin murphy Says:

    Yes, Approve.

  4. David Light Says:

    Please reconsider bolts to nowhere project.

    I feel that this proposal is contrived and incomplete. I believe that this unique and spectacular area should be developed with great care and consideration. There is certainly a place for bolts on the Maiden but this is not it!

    Thanks

    • David Light Says:

      This application was modified to include a third pitch after I made my initial comment. A complete route that climbs to the top of the tower is certainly more valid in my mind however I will still choose to vote NO!

      Thanks

  5. Chris Beh Says:

    Looks like a great route and I hope it is approved.

  6. Joseph Crotty Says:

    Direct, independent and aesthetic. I approve. Given the steep nature and length a top down approach will not work and in my eyes this application will put them in position to address a possible third pitch.

    Surely there is room for this route given the Kor-Dalke is bolted and crisscrosses the entire South Face.

    • David Light Says:

      Kor Dalke does have two bolts high on pitch 4 which I believe were placed in 1966 by the first ascent party for direct aid. This route meanders a lot because it follows a natural line of weakness up the tower. It is a bold trad climb and to use it as a precedent for establishing a bolted sport climb on the Maiden is confusing and wrong!

      Thanks

  7. Tod Anderson Says:

    This route should be approved as it will be a great addition to the Flatirons. It does not encroach upon pre-existing routes and goes up a spectacular formation. As noted by others, there are established trails and there won’t be any additional resource impacts. Furthermore, it adds a type of climbing not found in the Flatirons, multipitch relatively challenging climbing and will be a great winter route.

  8. Derek Lawrence Says:

    Looks like a great line! My opinion is that this should be approved.

  9. Rui Ferreira Says:

    I support this route. It meets my criteria of being developed with great care and consideration, one of them being that it be reviewed and approved in a public forum.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: